The New York Times has a heart-breaking account of the fallout of a steel plant closure in Lackawanna, an immediate suburb of my hometown of Buffalo, NY. Within weeks of the announced plant closure, 3 workers suffered heart attacks, two of which were fatal.
The first to have a heart attack was George Kull Jr., 56, a millwright who worked for three decades at the steel mills in Lackawanna, N.Y. Three weeks after learning that his plant was closing, he suddenly collapsed at home.
Less than two hours later, he was pronounced dead.
A few weeks after that, a co-worker, Bob Smith, 42, a forklift operator with four young children, started having chest pains. He learned at the doctor’s office that he was having a heart attack. Surgeons inserted three stents, saving his life.
Less than a month later, Don Turner, 55, a crane operator who had started at the mills as a teenager, was found by his wife, Darlene, slumped on a love seat, stricken by a fatal heart attack.
It is impossible to say exactly why these men, all in relatively good health, had heart attacks within weeks of one another. But interviews with friends and relatives of Mr. Kull and Mr. Turner, and with Mr. Smith, suggest that the trauma of losing their jobs might have played a role.
It’s not just in Lackawanna. Multiple studies have found that layoffs not only lead to increased health complications, they can also significantly decrease life expectancy even for relatively young workers.
A growing body of research suggests that layoffs can have profound health consequences. One 2006 study by a group of epidemiologists at Yale found that layoffs more than doubled the risk of heart attack and stroke among older workers. Another paper, published last year by Kate W. Strully, a sociology professor at the State University of New York at Albany, found that a person who lost a job had an 83 percent greater chance of developing a stress-related health problem, like diabetes, arthritis or psychiatric issues.
In perhaps the most sobering finding, a study published last year found that layoffs can affect life expectancy. The paper, by Till von Wachter, a Columbia University economist, and Daniel G. Sullivan, director of research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, examined death records and earnings data in Pennsylvania during the recession of the early 1980s and concluded that death rates among high-seniority male workers jumped by 50 percent to 100 percent in the year after a job loss, depending on the worker’s age. Even 20 years later, deaths were 10 percent to 15 percent higher. That meant a worker who lost his job at age 40 had his life expectancy cut by a year to a year and half.
Interestingly, while some of the workers had a history of health problems (and believe me, Buffalo isn’t the healthiest city in the world, with a food culture of beef on weck, fried chicken wings, and delicious [union-made!] Labatt beer doesn’t help), none died until the layoffs hit.
Nevertheless, it was not until after company officials announced that the Lackawanna plant was closing that any of the workers actually died from a heart attack.
Buffalo is a city wracked by the loss of manufacturing jobs; what was once an “All America City” that hosted the World’s Fair in 1901 (at which President McKinley was assassinated..sorry about that, America – but hey, we named a mall after him!) and until key shipping port for steel and grains has declined to a city with meager manufacturing and a prevalence of health care and financial jobs. The major steel company at which these workers were employed originally closed in 1985, after a long period of layoffs and declining production.
What is certain though is that Buffalo is a microcosm for the decline of manufacturing jobs, real American production, and the squeezing of America’s middle class. That workers internalize this stress shouldn’t be a surprise; it’s simply a sad testament to the new economy. Until there’s real investments made in jobs and in rebuilding the middle class, this decline of jobs, manufacturing, the middle class, and workers’ health will continue unabated.




21 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
This was a great post. Thanks.
Thanks, Banditelli… it was rushed and not entirely coherent but I hope it gives a good picture of the sorry condition of both Buffalo and America.
Expecting (or “Hope”-ing) capitalists to make those kind of investments is hopeless.
One of the big reasons capitalism ended slavery was because market capitalism shifted the long-term maintenance and ownership costs of labor from the employer to the laborer. Plantation owners were on the hook for the care of the slaves until they died. Capitalists were under no such constraint.
The “end of slavery” and its replacement with the “free labor market” was in essence the creation of the ability for business owners to lease, not buy, bodies.
And just like a leased car or any other object, what happens after the lease is over and the thing’s returned to the dealer just doesn’t matter.
Not having to care what happens to other people is the whole point of the system.
I don’t have a pleasant feeling today and I certainly appreciate the job being done by this blog. Its heavy lifting these days listening to people. I can’t help thinking these kind of blogs have become something like a high school reunion of older people. The fond memories are there, and its such a familiar place, but so much has happened…
Anyway. This story underlines the complete disconnect going on with our current government side show. I’m sickened by Obama, for reasons too numerous to mention, except that, as seen today, he continues to enforce his reputation as a prick and a condescending asshole. But I am also offended by Michelle and her ridiculous argument that people could eat better if they wanted to. Besides being the hypocrite that her body acknowledges, she obviously has no idea what good food costs these days, if you can get anything not contaminated by Monsanto, making your kids fat from additives meant for cattle.
This is absolute craziness what is going on in Washington. The post-modern world has truly entered the twilight zone. TV has become reality. Our government is now the unfortunate entertainment (games like the Roman coliseum).
Yes, and he’s way too full of himself to realize it. I doubt he realizes that he broke our trust and there isn’t anything he can do or say to rekindle it. We know our enemy and it’s Barack Obama, Mr. Free Market Corporation Man.
Now that comment was unwarranted and you should apologize.
sniff… snifniff swawry..
Take it from one who has lived through this that its a fact. I was laid off on Aug. 25th 2008 and had a major heart attack on July 11th 2009. I was very very lucky and got to the ER, had the attack was paddled back sent to surgery had two stints put in a blocked artery and was home 4 days later. Many or most don’t make it. Do I blame the lay off? Maybe, but in five yrs. since I lost the long term job I had, I was laid off or fired 4 times! Once your over 50 your nothing more then a target or worse. Now of course @ 60 with a bad heart realistically what chance do I have? Had I known what was in store for me after I sold my business in 1997 I would have never ever done it! Now , its to late and there is no going back down that path either as small business is a suicide route to nowhere in America today. The malls around here are emptying out of everyone but Corp. chains and dollar stores. If Obama thinks he’s rescued the economy let him spend a few weeks touring the ruins of the party on Wall st. he’s now supporting with his polices.
it is called capitalism and americans have a love affair with capitalism.
they bought hook line and sinker the trickle down theory.
problem was the wealth trickled up.
whoops.
the capitalists smiled all the way to their banks bailed out by the middle class
while wall street gives out bonuses americans work two jobs or long hrs and still they love their capitalism.
the capitalists are ten times smarter than most americans
history is living proof of this.
that is why they have most of the wealth a country has.
this is a decline of wealth for a nation not a recession.
but americans are drinking the recession and hope kool aid
I told americans when communism failed we were next and they laughed at me and called me a traitor.
capitalism and patroitism are synonyms in america.
just like the capitalists want it to be
they worked hard on the media to make sure the media conditioned americans to believe such a thing.
the media is controlled by corp america with their ads yes even the internet blogs.
It is generally accepted in the mental health fields that loss of a job is second only to death of a spouse in causing stress. But we don’t need the experts to tell us.
Saving the economy is code for convincing folks to adjust to a lower standard of living.
Thanks, I like you. It’s not like I haven’t screwed up before, so feel free to call me out anytime you think I crossed a line.
We’re living in crazy times and sooner or later . . .
Peace, brother.
We are so much more than what we do for a living and how much money we make. We diminish ourselves when we identify who and what we are by the job we have and what we are paid to do it.
No one is diminished as a human being or loved any less by those who love them, if they lose their job.
Please think about what I just said and remember it.
This truth is not limited to you. It applies to all of us.
This is not acceptable, ever.
It’s been working since Bill Clinton passed NAFTA and did away with welfare.
Yes Reagan et al stated it and carry its torch.
A worker losing his job at 40 loses a year and a half of his live expectancy. So you die at 75 rather than 76.5. That gives perspective to the size of the effect. If the rate of death increases from 2 per 5,000 to 4 per 5,000, that is a 100 percent increase. For you as the individual who happens to be one of the four, well, that’s a bad deal. But the actual risk increase for the individual is miniscule.
Yes, layoffs are very stressful, and yes, there is an increased risk of a somewhat earlier death, but get a grip folks, in the scope of things, it is not that important in increased mortality. This is simply a weak argument, and as such does not meaningfully contribute to the argument of the importance of maintaining/increasing decent paying jobs, and yes, redistributing wealth downward. The latter stands by itself as simply being fair.
I agree only in part, that being contentment in the fairness of things. One could interpret your construction to be workers and work are just interchangeable pegs and holes.
Quality of life at any age is important. Part of what makes for that is meaningful work. I don’t mean just money and entertainment but something that investing one’s assets in provides for a sense of worth and, yes. identity.
This post certainly makes an interesting point, and I look forward to further consideration of issues raised.
As long as no one here tries to assert that increased unemployment could increase instances of domestic violence, I think this discussion might proceed fruitfully.
Also.
Buffalo is a casualty. There is honestly no saving it. I am from Buffalo and the state government has come right out flat and said that they have no plans to help us or get us any jobs. They came right out and said it. They said that the only thing they know how to do is to expand the white collar medical sectors. It’s absurd and I am guessing that Buffalo isn’t the only place suffering like this. These people truly have no idea what they are doing, and so they are doing absolutely nothing at all.
Posts like this always give me chest pains, for two reasons. One, I’m the same age as one of the stricken workers, and even the thought of getting a pink slip makes my chest tighten a bit (kid in college, ongoing family health issues that require good insurance, etc.) That I can identify with these folks is obvious. However, from a systemic perspective (economic system, that is), these sorts of articles frustrate me because, though every word they contain is true, there is always the “What about the causes?” analysis that gets left out. Why did Bethlehem have to shut down? Did the Chinese/Indians/Mexicans/name-your-boogeyman-cheap-labor-nation-of-choice collude to drive prices for mfrd. steel on the world market down far enough that Bethlehem, paying top dollar for folks doing good union jobs, could not possibly compete? What, then, becomes of the writer’s agenda? Is it an argument for protectionism to bring the American steel industry back, like the Phoenix? Even if protectionism always worked, that takes care of only the U.S. market. How would Bethlehem, which no doubt included within its receivables some revenues from overseas, force potential buyers outside the U.S to buy its higher priced steel? That company’s problems predate the toxic condition in which Wall Street stopped loaning to American companies to expand and, instead, went into a perverted arrangement where “things” like CDOs became all the rage, but any talk about bringing back good American manufacturing jobs would almost certainly involve dragooning Geithner’s buddies at Goldman Sachs, et al., into participating and truly supporting the American economy, sometimes to the reduction of their own corporate bottom lines. Then there is the issue of who should work in a “revitalized” American manufacturing sector. Even if a brand spanking new steel mill or (as was more common where I live, but now becoming extinct) lumber mill opened up in this town, I would advise my kid to RUN from a trap job like that, punching the clock and punching out steel/lumber/tires/you-name-it in some industry that, even in the best of times, is wont to wobble on its perch like a canary in a mineshaft. I certainly wouldn’t do that work anymore, even if I were physically able to. It’s a fool’s errand to place one’s economic well-being all in one good capitalist’s basket, much less do it for an entire 40 to 50 year career. When I read this, I thought, fantastic: You have the Queen-for-a-Day angle covered (lots of hardship, death, heroic American workers, etc.); now what can you possibly posit as a solution to the problem, given the syphilitic sort of economic policies and financial requirements we as citizens now have in order to feed, clothe, shelter, and medically provide for ourselves?
This is getting ready to scroll into oblivion so it’s not worth putting much effort into a comment.
That may in fact be a metaphor for the way much of the human race has been doing business for millennia. Basically plunder until the resources, human or material, then move on to a new spot.
We have run out of new spots and that way is scrolling into oblivion.
There is no restoration of what is killing the planet in the offing.
A whole new way, I call it sustainable and collaborative life style, will I hope emerge.
(Just linked to this over at the News Desk, but thought it fit right in with the subject-matter here, too.)
The Lithuanian legacy of Larry Summers.
“[In] 1990, when Summers first arrived, Lithuania’s suicide rate was 26.1 per 100,000 and falling.
“Just five years after Summers got his hands on Lithuania’s economy, life became so unbearable under the economic transition that the suicide rate nearly doubled to 45.6 per 100,000, worse than any other ex-Soviet republic in transition. In fact, it was the highest suicide rate in the world, suggesting something particularly harsh and brutal about the economic transition in that country as opposed to the others, where suffering and pain were common.”
Link.