When asked about this clear pattern of illnesses of workers who come in contact BP’s oil and chemical dispersants, BP CEO Tony Hayward callously dismissed the health problems as “food poisoning.”
“I’m sure they were genuinely ill, but whether it was anything to do with dispersants and oil, whether it was food poisoning or some other reason for them being ill,” said Hayward.
“You know, food poisoning is clearly a big issue when you have a concentration of this number of people in temporary camps, temporary accommodation, it’s something we have to be very, very mindful of, continued Hayward. “It’s one of the big issues of keeping the army operating. You know, armies march on their stomachs.”
Bullshit, pure and simple.
Corexit, BP’s preferred petroleum-based chemical “dispersant” used by the company, caused lifelong illnesses when used to break up and clean oil in the Exxon Valdez spill. Now 600,000+ gallons of Corexit has been dumped from the skies by BP since the spill, with a constant spray of Corexit aimed at the oil gushers 5,000 feet below sea level.
Being near the oil last week on the shore of Louisiana was enough to make myself and Ivan Oleander nauseous when the wind was right. These fishermen are boating through thick coats of oil on the open waters – “as thick as peanut butter,” one fisherman told me – with planes dumping dispersants from the sky at the same time.
It’s obvious that this is a toxic stew that would make anyone sick. Throw in the facts that BP tells its hired fishermen that they do not need protective gear because there’s no health risks, and it’s clear BP is ignorant, lying, or worse. Because if you ask Tony Hayward, it’s just food poisoning.



67 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
Can you notice a difference between oil smell and Corexit or are both smells mixed together?
Yesterday we heard him say he is ready to have his life back…He’s just not that into this. Give the man a break. /s
Tony needs to keep on talking. Each stupid, insensitive sentence is another nail in the oil coffin of BP.
Are the relief workers eating the oil?
Wow. Okay so your next question is to ask “What is the time frame for providing respriators for all workers?” You don’t ask it as if it is a question of if, but When.
Also, anticipate their response and prepare a follow up.
They will probably go on about it not being “a hazard.”
have your illness stats IN HAND on paper to give them “x workers sickened, not food posioning” and “y workers sickened in Alaska.”
They will want to dismiss you on this. Ask them if they need the government to issue an order.
Then if they dismiss that ask if they are setting aside money to treat people with respiratory illness who operated without gear.
The key is to anticipate their dismissal responses and delay tactics. Also assume that they will do the right thing and force them to articulate when they are not. Get them on record now about timing and dismissal of ill effects. It will also help lawyers with future law suits.
Then drop the video of your questions and their answers to the “real” media.
He’s the oil industry version of Lloyd Blankfein’s “Goldman Sachs is doing the Lord’s Work”
Well, I think Tony needs to demonstrate just how safe it is, and jump in and take a swim, a long swim, a really long swim while towing that barge-load of bullshit he’s been dishing out.
With all the billions at stake in potential liability and loss of corporate goodwill (heh), it’s a good business decision to spend many millions on spin control*, a small percentage of assets/income. The effective percentage return is huge! If they can just kick the can down the road far enough people’s (potential jurors) outrage will abate a little.
*{my favorite so far, heard in passing on the radio, is BP making sure to collect the clothes cleanup workers have worn…but then again, there are the video technical difficulties, the low ball estimates, the chasing journalists out of oily areas, etc.}
Not to be coy, aren’t there safety regulations for workers when dealing with not just the oil in the water, but the toxic combinations that can occur when the chemical reaction of the oil and Corexit mix. Shouldn’t the workers be wearing not just protective clothing, but be wearing a Respirator when working in the waters where the mixture in taking place. Aren’t there OSHA regulations for this sort of thing. Isn’t the government supposed to be enforcing OSHA regulations on recalcitrant business entities. Is everyone involved with this cleanup ignorant bastards!
And Obama trusted this criminal to plug the hole in the Gulf? Obama and trust just another oxymoron.
Yeah… that’s it. Food Poisoning.
Must have eaten some bad seafood somewhere.
Does Karl Rove have family in the UK?
The White House thinks sunburn is making them sick.
Hysterical!
Uh, nice try Tony, but this isn’t England.
A good friend lived in England for about 10 years told me the people called in sick to work with food poisoning on a regular basis.
Apparently they weren’t very diligent about refridgerating food.
For example, you go into a deli and pre packaged sandwiches, with say mayo would sit out for hours and hours and nobody thought anything of it.
But, really, as far as anyone from BP goes, everything they say should be ignored. They clearly aren’t very smart guys. I mean they don’t even have the sense to appear credible when they’re yanking our chains.
Thank God Obama is leaving everything in the Gulf in their capable hands.
On the other hand we should not dismiss out of hand what Tony is telling us. He is indeed prescient because for the next few decades anyone who eats seafood from the Gulf will surely get food poisoning, that is if there is any seafood. My, my, meet the new prophet from the UK. You think he has any hot tips on the stock market?
Clearly this moron has no idea what food poisoning means nor how it comes about. Of course if the workers were eating the marine life killed by the oil then he might have a point.
Food Poisoning == Poisoned Food.
Crude oil contains a number of poisonous and volatile substances that cause symptoms like what’s been reported in sufficient airborne concentrations. The four worst actors are benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene. They’re a large part of what give people who sniff glue or huff gasoline a high.
Someone on a C&L thread pointed out that application of dispersant causes much higher evaporation rates of these components in the short term, so you would expect application of dispersant to be correlated with symptoms from exposure to those compounds.
Enough Already!
Can we just lock Tony Hayward up!
The more Tony Hayward speaks the more you realize how much of a hole he really is. The USA citizens living on the Gulf deserve better.
I can’t wait to hear Obama confirm what his master just said it was food poison.
Word.
One hopes it is heard.
You are the master of this “understanding”, spocko.
DW
Imprison him
what a dick
The quality of their lying is a clear demonstration of their capabilities.
I do wonder if Mr Hayward can pee straight while using both hands.
Most people: Yes, yes, yes, yes and yes!
Hayward: No, no, no, no and no!
“They’re just enjoying a brisk fragrance. The Gulf is all, like, rose petals and butterflies nurturing their young on fetal petroleum love…”
Kabuki politics at its finest.
I keep trying to think of a remark from James Watt about a threat from trees…does anyone recall?
Idea!
Take a big, oily Gulf shrimp and stick it up his arse and send him out for a ‘new’ interview on food poisoning!
I can’t remember his words but I do remember that about the same time Reagan said that trees cause pollution.
If the Govt was in charge like the Prez says,
Then why were they using corexit ?
The Prez dodged this question at the press conference
would like to know why.
But really when the facts come out whenever,I am sure
the WH was looking for more campaign contributions from BP
hence their lackadaisical response to the crisis.
One thing is clear enough to me.The dramatic change that
the country needs is not going to come from Obama
he is just as dismissive of ordinary Americans needs
as the last guy who was the Prez.
That may be the remark I was struggling for; I had a good friend who did a marvelous snarky imitation about those terrible trees. Wonder why I was reminded of that? Ive had food poisoning and it didn’t start with respiratory trouble. Too much.
Well, not the trees comment (which I think Twain is correct about at 24), but this is from the end of his wikipedia page:
[Mod Note: Be careful about postings that advocate violence from any perspective.]
“The effects will be very moderate”
“There are no undersea plumes”
“Maybe it’s food poisoning”
Jesus.
This guy is toast. Surely to god there’s no way he’ll be CEO much longer. You know the PR department is just tearing their hair out over this clown.
For my money his worst comment to date was where he said “We want to stop the leak – I want my life back”
If that’s not narcissism personified then I have no clue what is.
What an asshole.
The gift that keeps on giving….thanks.
Nah. He has a piss boy.
Thanks! I’m dangerous because I know how they think. This question coming from a lowly blogger can be even more confusing when asked when the “real” media are present. It’s kind of a Columbo thing. You ask as if you don’t know the answers and assume that they of couse will “do the right thing” also expect the first time you ask the questions to be delayed with a “we don’t know when” or we will get back to you. Tell them you are on a deadline for FDL and you would like an answer by Wednesday. This triggers their clock. They will think they need to get that info because only “real” media have deadlines.
Here is another trick I don’t see many people using. Say that by some chance someone else asks a question like yours. They get a dismissal. Help them out by referencing their question and moving the narrative ball forward.
The spokespeople are trained to have one level of dismissal and if they used it up on one person they know that the other media won’t “waste” their one question doing follow up on some one else’s question. The media rarely work together this way they ask the same questions in different fashions but they rarely help out someone else. It’s ego vs getting more info. The other benefit of doing this is that if you help them with the question they will also write about the answer or the failure to answer.
So for example when I asked Murdock my question about Fox subsidizing Beck the other press on the call wrote about it.
I Googled it. Watt said that when the last tree was felled, Christ would come back. How’s that for nuttiness?
Christ will come back pissed and ask, “Where are my trees motherforker?!”
That’s exactly what I heard. He does not have time for all that wildlife, fish, and cajuns. No wonder he is not providing protective gear…outrageous.
I hope, spocko, that you may educate us further, and refresh our memories often, in the days ahead, we shall have need of it.
My deepest appreciation, for your wisdom, your patience, your understanding, and your humanity. All of which, you share.
DW
Watt was one of the strangest people I’ve ever seen. He had this absolutely insane look in his eyes that was truly scary.
As with the eight years of bush administration – I think the American people deserve better lies.
We are one of the most powerful nations on earth and we get third world lies. We deserve better.
Mr Hayward should stand on the deck of one those recovery vessels and tell how personal protection is not necessary and how yummy the water tastes right from the skimmer pump.
LOL…He was a fundie before we knew to worry….Thanks for finding that. (My cat is looking at me like I seriously lost it b/c I laughed so hard.)
Thanks.
And take a sip….I always think of the scene when Julia Roberts tried to get the woman lawyer to take a drink of water that the company “surely” had not polluted…the woman almost gagged.
NPR had coverage of big protests in Turkey….I have to get outta here for awhile….thanks for such wisdom.
From a PR point of view Heyward is like some Frankenstein monster. But like everything else we have been following for the last year, it is also deeply instructive. It shows us just how far the rot and corruption permeates every aspect of our elites. Heywood is not the exception. He’s the rule.
Thanks I try to help we are up against very powerful forces, well trained and well paid.
Michael. If you want to develop these questions more specificaly I’m happy to do it offline.
I’m at spockosemail at gmail
The former Sec. of the Interior’s comments are newsworthy, and serve to point out that the right wing of our government coddles those whose malevolence towards the public knows no bounds. In an era when the government is deploying Tasers and microwave radiation against its people, and using commando-style raids against civilians in their homes, many of them innocent victims of government-sanctioned brutality, it’s wise to understand the people responsible for crises such as the epic disaster in the Gulf, like the government that attacked the peace flotilla in international waters, killing many of them with impunity, see nothing wrong with publicly giving tacit approval to violence when they perceive they are not getting their way.
This is a large part of James Watt’s legacy; many, many more similar quotes are attributed to him. Discussing Watt as if this isn’t part of who he became is unfairly honoring one of our domestic enemies of our Constitution. It’s one thing to advocate violence; to say that was even implied in my comment is missing the point entirely. It’s quite another altogether to point out that men who demand we treat them with respect are, in fact, encouraging acts of violence against those who disagree with them.
The right does not want dialogue. They simply want their way, and if you don’t like it, well, they’ve got a solution for that.
Oil is still spewing.
BP is still in charge.
Toxins are dumped in gargantuan amounts in one of the world’s great spawning grounds for marine life.
Frankly, these people, our corporate despots and their government enablers, detest life in all of its forms, with the exception of the sociopath they see in the mirror every morning, and they’re damn proud to prove it at every conceivable opportunity.
Also from wikipedia:
[Mod Note: The fact that the advocacy of violence is being quoted notwithstanding, we do not generally allow discussions of this type of violence at FDL precisely because it is much too easy for folks to start calling for violence against others.]
Oh yeah, I remember that…didn’t he say trees caused smog?
Reasonable. Yet, there seems to be a concerted effort on some sites to avoid it to the point where dialogue devolves. When one cannot point out what the government is doing, the government is free to do anything to anyone at any time.
Perhaps in the future we can evolve into a society that isn’t afraid of its own shadow so we can discuss freely what is actually going on without treating the harsh realities of life, and our political institutions, as if this is a never-ending episode of Ozzie and Harriet.
In the meantime, redact away. We wouldn’t want to rouse the natives.
[Edited by Moderator]
[Mod Note: Not even rhetorically]
Yes, and trees produce turpentine. They do. They do produce smog-related compounds. So, although Reagan was ridiculed for trying to defend industry by scapegoating trees, which have been here in more massive numbers than today for generations, as with most right-wing propaganda there is a tiny sliver of fact from which they hang their political capital.
Trees were declining in number, but industry was ramping up. It was a way to deflect attention, generate a predictable reaction, and troll that reaction for political gain. They controlled the message, they controlled the government and they succeeded in passing every bit of their agenda while those on the left were derided as “tree huggers” and the like.
It was really sleazy, and it really worked to their advantage. Lies and half-truths, repeated often with dripping sarcasm, is effective politics in D.C., anyway.
Article from Las Vegas Review Journal:
http://www.lvrj.com/news/exxon-valdez-oil-risks-spur-warning-for-gulf-cleanup-crews-93258964.html
The workers who are cleaning up the oil in the Gulf need to be aware of the chemicals that will be used. I am one of the 11,000+ cleanup workers from the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS), who is suffering from health issues from that toxic cleanup, without compensation from Exxon.
My name is Merle Savage; a female general foreman during the EVOS beach cleanup in 1989, which turned into 20 years of extensive health deterioration for me and many other workers. Dr. Riki Ott visited me in 2007 to explain about the toxic spraying on the beaches. She also informed me that Exxon’s medical records that surfaced in litigation by sick workers in 1994, had been sealed from the public, making it impossible to hold Exxon responsible for their actions.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5632208859935499100
Exxon developed the toxic spraying; OSHA, the Coast Guard, and the state of Alaska authorized the procedure; VECO and other Exxon contractors implemented it. Beach crews breathed in crude oil that splashed off the rocks and into the air — the toxic exposure turned into chronic breathing conditions and central nervous system problems, along with other massive health issues. Some of the illnesses include neurological impairment, chronic respiratory disease, leukemia, lymphoma, brain tumors, liver damage, and blood disease. http://www.silenceinthesound.com/stories.shtml
Okay mod at least you will read this..They should ……… the nearest and highest yardarm, like a pinata, he is responsible for something so huge and disastrous the cost in life is incalculable.
I hereby personally volunteer to pound a 55 gallon drum of Corexit up[Edited by Moderator] … sideways. I don’t think there is a hot enough spot in hell for this bastard.
I don’t know if this has been mentioned,but the other night on CNN, there was a lengthy story on the dispersant.
A canister of it was shown to the camera, where the reporter read the warning label out loud to the viewers. It read:
DO NOT INHALE VAPORS.
Let him breath this toxic stew 24/7. Just my take and totally irrelevant.
Nothing really matters except doing everything possible to stop this. If it gets into the gulf current in any great volume we are really in trouble, if it is even possible to be more fucked considering the total annihilation of the gulf region, and the death of the fishing industry, among many thousands of deaths and untold consequences.
Why is no one focusing on the Higher altitude aerosol dispersals (HAAD) operations? It is suspected that these are to mitigate the large amounts of methane (300x more potent than CO2 as a greenhouse gas) and other volatiles “evaporating” at the spill site. NOAA estimates as much as 30-40% of the mass of the oil spill is being dissapated in this way. I spent two days on a shrimp boat off the St. Bernard Parish right after Mother’s Day and observed massive higher altitude spray operations at several altitudes. Observed from about 15000′ – 25000′ – it looks look jet contrails but spreads out into observable cloud layers. As a retired airline Captain and former Navy jet pilot, I can assure you these are not normal contrails. This might turn out to be a bigger problem than the oil in the water.
EPA claims to be monitoring air quality but sites chosen are questionable.
Captain Ron
I have worked in oil fields in dangerous conditions where hydrogen sulfide was turning the litmus paper in my swamp cat brown and I was suppose to have oxygen to breath and told not to worry..no big deal
Excuse me but these fucks lie and lie some more, I alternate between tears and anger right now.
It would probably go right in..being the size asshole he is.
These are chemtrails filled with nanoparticles of Aluminum, Barium, and Strontium. Very toxic. Been going for years.
http://www.blacklistednews.com/news-7958-0-5-5–.html
http://www.carnicominstitute.org/carnren.htm
What we’re seeing here is yet another result of the “privatization” of everything the Government used to do, in this case, Disaster Management. Behold the results: the Gulf destroyed, tens of thousands of citizens ruined, and now poisoned from their Potemkin clean up. And I hope they don’t submit their long term medical bills to BP, ’cause there’s nothing there for them, or us, now and forever.
The teabaggers, neocons, neoliberals, and libertardians should be thrilled. This is what their ideology looks like in the real world: Government the enforcement arm and valet of the corporate overlords, however many thousands, or millions suffer and die as a result.
Wait ’til hurricane season gets rolling, you ain’t seen nothing yet.
British Petroleum (BP): environmental terrorists.
Food poisoning…of course, how we could we not guess this?
And it follows that the 11 workers who were blown to pieces died of heat stroke…or maybe they spontaneously combusted and caused the rig to blow up. Yeah…it was their fault.
Actually I am very familiar with “chemtrails” but we are trying to reframe the language to “high altitude aerosol dispersant”. It is not a very big leap from understanding low level spraying (ie agent orange in VN and low level oil dispersants in Gulf)to the high level stuff. Check out filmmaker Capt. Gary Burris new site below. He has been following the story for 8 years and has come up with some interesting theories as to the medical repercussions of the spraying and has developed some good ideas about where and why they spray.
http://blog.greenmodel.org/
Captain Ron
Nationalize Deepwater Horizon.
Any proceeds from Deepwater Horizon, whether spilled oil captured or oil extracted from the reservoir DH is tapping, should primarily go to Gulf Coast residents, workers and business owners, who are getting hammered by this man-made disaster, and no other oil company can tap into this 22,000-foot-deep oil reservoir, trying to do an end-run.
Affected states and the federal government can receive a percentage of the DH oil proceeds, but only to cover state and federal expenses in dealing with this catastrophe.
BP has already pocketed $275 million in insurance coverage. They should not be allowed to profit anymore from a disaster that they caused. Not a single red, blood-soaked, oil-soaked dime.
The model for this can be based on what Alaskans have in place already, with a few modifications, that is, the nationalization of a single oil well. Alaskans receive oil royalty checks each year from the Alaskan government, in which they, the citizens, benefit from all the oil activity in Alaska. We need a similar set-up for Gulf Coast residents and states affected by BP’s Deepwater Horizon disaster, with no questions asked, no bureaucratic roadblocks put in place, all one has to do is prove that one is a resident, worker or business owner in any of the affected states.
Chemtrails? Really? Next you’re going to be going on about HAARP or the Illuminati.
Hmmm…”food poisoning or some other reason for being ill”? Has someone (or someone’s lawyers) been reading “A Civil Action”?
There is too much visible evidence of high altitude aerosol dispersant spraying (which you refer to as “chemtrails”)to deny it. The health consequences are everywhere. Why you choose to deny it, I don’t know. No one yet seems to have all the answers about “who, what why where & when” but it sure warrants some serious questions. Its funny, when someone gets too close to the truth, the disinformation machine ties to label it a conspiracy.
Had your vitamin “D” level checked lately or know a lot of people with thyroid problems?
CaptainRon
No kidding.
Air Sampling Finds a Compound in Toxic Dispersant Is Also in the Air – 19 hours ago
But McClatchy notes that the dispersants’ toxins may be making its way into the air that workers are breathing. Air sampling data gathered to ensure the …
ProPublica (blog) – 24 related articles »
NOTE: This is an EXCELLENT piece- well worth the reading!
I wonder what chemicals they are using in the higher altitude aerosol dispersant being sprayed downwind of the spill site at altitudes up to 25,000′
Captain Ron