
Cleanup Workers, Grand Isle, LA (Michael Whitney/Firedoglake)
On Thursday Reps. James Oberstar and Jerry Nadler wrote to the EPA and Department of Labor urging the agencies to ensure cleanup workers for the BP oil disaster have access to “proper personal protection equipment,” as well as the cooperation of the agencies to “federal laws governing worker safety and respiratory protection.”
The letter from the two senior members of Congress outlined reports from fishermen and other workers who reported illnesses, and relied on a May 25 letter from OSHA Administrator David Michaels to Admiral Thad Allen, the man in charge of the federal response to the BP oil disaster. (You can find both letters at the bottom of this post.)
Nadler and Oberstar wrote of Michaels’ letter:
David Michaels, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, raised concerns in a memo to Admiral Thad Allen about BP’s ability or willingness to protect its workers. Mr. Michaels’ wrote, “The organizational systems that BP has in place, particularly those related to worker safety and health training, protective equipment, and site monitoring, are not adequate for the current situation or the projected increase in clean-up operations.” Mr. Michaels also wrote, “I want to stress that these are not isolated problems. They appear to be indicative of a general systematic failure on BP’s part, to ensure the safety and health of those responding to this disaster.”
Those are some strong words from OSHA to the government’s leading man in this disaster. It’s clear why Reps. Nadler and Oberstar would press EPA and DOL on worker safety, and use Michaels’ letter to do so.
So why, just hours after the Congressmen sent their letter, did OSHA Administrator Michaels do a full 180 on BP’s commitment to worker safety?
On this blog, Dr. Kirk Murphy noted that as of Friday, Michaels will not require workers to use respirators – an OSHA decision eerily similar to one the agency made for 9/11 cleanup workers, a corollary that was referenced by Reps. Oberstar and Nadler, the latter of whose district included Ground Zero.
The Wall Street Journal, of all places, spoke with Michaels. Here’s some of what he said in his newfound appreciation of BP’s commitment to worker safety.
David Michaels, assistant secretary for the Department of Labor’s OSHA, said in an interview Thursday that based on test results so far, cleanup workers are receiving “minimal” exposure to airborne toxins. OSHA will require that BP provide certain protective clothing, but not respirators.
Mr. Michaels said he remains worried about heat illnesses, given the high temperatures, long hours and resulting fatigue. He also is concerned about injuries “because there are many hazards out there” such as bites from wildlife, wet and slippery or uneven surfaces, boats and use of heavy equipment.
Mr. Allen helped to communicate the concerns to BP, which has since addressed “many” of them, Mr. Michaels said Thursday.
In recent days, OSHA has been working more closely with BP and continues to monitor working conditions daily with the help of about 20 agency staffers across the Gulf, Mr. Michaels said.
“When we see concerns, we report them to the Coast Guard and to BP. BP is responsible for abating the hazards,” he said.
Mr. Michaels said Thursday that the improvements had prevented any need for enforcement action and OSHA is focusing on helping BP comply with existing regulations.
Quite frankly, it sounds like OSHA has been co-opted into the labyrinth of BP cleanup operations. I don’t understand how in 10 days a company can go from “general systemic failure” to near full-compliance with OSHA regulations, completely erasing the need for OSHA to even consider “any need for enforcement action.”
Louisiana officials aren’t satisfied. The state’s health and environment officials requested OSHA continue to press BP for adequate safety measures to protect cleanup workers:
Health and Hospitals Secretary Alan Levine and Environmental Quality Secretary Peggy Hatch say that daily reports of injuries and illness have them worried that workers don’t get proper protection. They asked the Occupational Safety and Health Administration on Friday to investigate.
The secretaries say BP may bring 3,000 more cleanup workers to Louisiana, and the agencies want to ensure that all get the training, protective equipment and supplies they need.
The Department of Labor also needs to be vigilant about other aspects of BP’s treatment of workers. Fishermen and others hired by BP for cleanup work say that BP hasn’t paid them on time, or even called them to work. Multiple workers also report that BP threatens to fire anyone who brings their own personal protection equipment, like respirators.
More needs to be done to protect the workers working for BP to clean up its oil disaster. At the very least, workers should be free to use their own respirators, even if OSHA won’t require BP to provide them. If the government doesn’t step up and do all it can, now, to protect these workers, we’ll deal with lifelong illnesses for thousands of people.
Oberstar-Nadler Letter to EPA, OSHA
OSHA Letter to Admiral Allen about BP’s Lack of Worker Safety



30 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
Hey, what’s a few workers lives when compared to business profits!
It surprises me that Solis seems to absent on this issue.
True, afterall how many BP workers have died in explosions the last several years? What’s a few more?!
OSHA is just another government agency the like the Coast Guard believes they work for private industry.
Full-face respirators can be had for less than $100
if purchased individually, probably far less if purchased in quantity.
Is BP still threatening to fire workers that bring in their own air masks? If so I want OSHA to answer why?
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=131672870177635
Spocko has a facebook group on this it helps if you join it gives the Press a number behind how many people are worried about this.
Good question can our friends in the Unions get an answer from the White House?
Can anyone explain to me why BP won’t give its workers Respirators? Why are they threatening to fire workers who bring in their own Respirators?
Is it legal liability? I would think with another few months before the relief wells are drilled that BP is facing tons of liability from sick workers.
Much more than they would get if yes they admit the oil spill is toxic.
Is BP worried about bad press I think workers getting sick because they don’t have Respirators would make it worse.
We must understand why BP are being suck Jerks so we can attack their reasons and change their minds.
Does anyone have any ideas?
It appears that there is not one person in the executive branch that possesses a shred of integrity. I’m sure Barry got on the horn with David and told him to whistle a happy tune. Rather than telling the King to piss off and let him do his job, our hero David just said, “well ok then sir, if you say so, you bet”.
At least Michaels is surrounded by friends: Napolitano, Lubchenko, Chu, and of course the big kahuna himself, BP Obama.
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/52924
My bold Working in an environment where there is the potential for exposure above published limits (whether or not a respirator is worn).
Has the EPA tested the air around the beaches and by the boats is the air in fact within limits? Can we get those results?
Can local pups get air samples to be tested independently?
As far as large corporations are concerned, OSHA has become “just a small town in Wisconsin”.
Michael can you add a blurb about this post and a link to Spocko’s face book page if you please.
MSDS for crude oil (from Martin/Marietta)
INHALATION: May cause respiratory and nasal irritation. Central nervous system effects may include headache,dizziness, loss of balance and coordination, unconsciousness, coma, respiratory failure, and death.
In circumstances of emergency response involving an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, personnel must wear
positive self-contained breathing apparatus while engaged in the emergency response operations until it is determined through the
use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection will not result in hazardous exposures to employees (29 CFR
1910.120(q)(3)(iv)).
Linky:
OSHA flacking for BP, the Coast Guard flacking for BP, police departments doing enforcement for BP. Hey Obama, ever wonder why people think BP is calling the shots? Idiot.
We have no government any more other than the fiat rule of the corporations. What happened some time ago in other countries by bloody coup (eg, Chile) has now happened here. The bloodshed is often not immediate, but there will be blood… just talk to the 9/11 first responders and those workers who ASSURED by the EPA that the air quality was just fine and jim dandy.
This is our corporate reality now. And the POTUS says: deal with it. Too bad so sad if you don’t like it.
Yes it does seem that either Obama is not really engaged in and checking the situation besides going to New Orleans for photo ops. Or he is bought.
Again we face the question is our President Stupid or a puppet bought by Big Oil?
The less is done to help the workers the more those states will end up supporting the environment in the long run.
BP the Dems and GOP should realize they all lose the longer they sit on their hands and do nothing to protect the workers.
Next they need to pay the workers are the workers getting full pay or unemployment which I believe is less than full pay?
This is the kind of field monitoring equipment one uses now: Baseline-MOCON, Inc. Detectors & Sensors, Continuous Analyzers and Gas Chromatographs and the applications. Prospectively, you’d rack-mount the equipment in a truck, apply power, ride up to the monitoring location and let ‘er rip for continuous monitoring of a point source (e.g. an industrial stack) or ambient air (this application, I believe). The results could be RF’d real-time and databased as the values come in. Prospectively, a good-guy engineering company willing to dispatch a few field engineers with respirators and the required equipment could do the trick. Bet you could do remote sensing via LEO or GeoSat satellites and cross-check the picture on the ground the equipment is getting as remote sensing was used in the 1970s to find mineral deposits. Why not sort the data for moving clouds of gases then throw the data visualization pictures up on a screen for the analysts?
It is more complicated than just “handing out respirators”. There is a liability issue for BP if workers are not given a complete physical, including a Pulmonary Function Test. A PFT determines the lung capacity of an individual and is used to further determine the fitness of the individual to wear the PPD, in this case a respirator. My guess is that there simply isn’t enough facilities to test every clean up worker in the gulf, and the record keeping with temporary and transient workers would be a nightmare. Although I have little sympathy for BP or OSHA, I do see the problems with respiratory protection requirements.
They have had over 30 days to test workers Maybe if they started at the beginning they could have tested enough workers by now?
I like it can we get this testing equipment on a boat? How close can the local pups get it to the beach.
I still would like an answer as to whether the EPA has done any tests. I’m not a lawyer but it seems they would be required to by law.
If the EPA is breaking the law by not testing…well things get interesting.
The degree of testing and training required is dependent on the level of protection. From full blown SCBA’s down to dust masks. “It would cost too much or take too much training” is not a valid reason for not following the law – unless your BP
It’s simple. There is no problem unless the government ADMITS there is a problem. Agent Orange, Gulf War Syndrome, 9/11 toxic cleanup, cancer clusters, etc. Deny, deny, deny in the face of incontrovertable evidence as long as the other side doesn’t have billions to sue, you never have to pay damages. At the very least, you can postpone damages for decades and hopefully the Supremes will slash any judgement against you.
I would like to know EPA’s monitoring of air quality. if it is done by EPA personnel or the analytical task is outsourced to some labs those who, in the past, have provided services to BP. Also, it would help to know the typical composition of crude from the accident site (Benzene and Mercaptans or H2-S compounds). Such information can easily be found from environmental documents BP submitted to EPA/State Agencies etc (permits, impact statements) before they started drilling.
Check Material Safety Data Sheet of Benzene
http://specialtygasesofamerica.com/msds/benzene-msds.pdf
And MSDS for Hydrogen Sulfide:
http://www.vngas.com/pdf/g94.pdf
MMS, the Coast Guard, NOAA, the EPA, OSHA, is there a government agency that isn’t in BP’s pocket? This makes me skeptical about the DOJ investigation. The DOJ has the power to destroy BP with a criminal indictment, but when I look at how all other government agencies are working more for BP than us, I have to wonder is the DOJ there to nail BP or defend it, as in no criminal indictment.
Did you even read the article above…? Second graf from the bottom talks to your question…
Thanks for referencing CFR 1910.120 (q)! Part of Medical Survelliance requires establishing a “baseline” for VOC’s, or any other contaminants. I don’t see any of this being done!
My experience includes Love Canal and Aquatech Labs, as HSE Mgr. My “Bible” was the NIOSH Pocket guide. My “Best Bud” was my photo ionization detector (PID). Any of my friends or associates heading for work on this vergazie would wear dosimeters! An outside lab would analyze EVERY 30 days!
Jindal will have to give back all his Big Oil contributions for long-term medical treatment of many of these brave people! Watch! He will ask the feds to help!
FYI OSHA has posted their data:
http://www.osha.gov/oilspills/oil_directreading_bysite.html
Should there be more monitoring? Hell yeah, but that’s the data.
EPA Air monitoring data: http://www.epaaspect.net/googleearth/dhorizon_April_2010/main/reports/aspect_data_output_flight_28_23_May_2010_deep_water.pdf