Earlier this month, Rep. Carolyn Maloney – one of the members of Congress who fought to protect 9/11 cleanup workers, and who is continuing that advocacy for workers cleaning up BP’s oil disaster – called on OSHA to explain how it would enforce the government’s respirator guidelines. Maloney also pressed the agency in charge of worker health and safety for more details on how it’s protecting workers in the Gulf.
Today, I find myself deeply concerned that the unprecedented size, complexity, and duration of the BP oil spill cleanup operation may mean that the risks of long term exposure to the many hazards the cleanup workers face are underestimated. In your testimony, you noted that those risks include, but are not limited to, exposure to and inhalation of the fumes from crude oil, oil byproducts, dispersants, cleaning chemicals and the smoke from burn-off efforts at sea. [...]
I have reviewed the NIOSH-OSHA Interim Guidance report for protecting oil spill cleanup and response workers and value the recommendations and precautions outlined in this report. I am glad to see that these recommendations include when respirators are needed by location and hazard as well as what type of respirator should be worn. However, I could not find a clear indication of what OSHA will do to enforce the use of respirators.
This brings me to the purpose of this letter. I request from you the following information:
- How will OSHA enforce the use of respirators and other protective clothing in those conditions that require cleanup workers to wear them?
- Given that a simple shift in the wind can alter whether or not cleanup workers require a respirator mask, how is OSHA ensuring timely and adequate monitoring of conditions and hazards across the vast expanse of the spill?
- What scientific and systemic efforts has OSHA undertaken to balance the very serious concerns of heat exhaustion with the need to wear personal protective equipment, including respirators, in the appropriate risk environments?
- Do you have a “Safety-Whistleblower Hotline”? A well publicized “800” number where workers can report safety lapses?
- Are the oversight resources of 25 inspectors currently available to OSHA adequate for the task at hand?
- What steps is OSHA taking to ensure reports and data of health concerns are collected in a centralized place?
- In assessing exposure to such a high risk environment, one that has never before been encountered on such a scale, are you fully confident that you have accounted for the true long term risks to cleanup workers health?
Maloney sent her letter on July 8 (I’ve been meaning to hit this for a while); I’ve asked to see if OSHA has responded, and will update when I hear.





6 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
Day-late-dollar-short Maloney takes nearly 3 months & all she can do is write a letter. Not even a sternly worded one at that. Post 9/11 redux.
Good on her.
These workers are unlikely her constituents, and yet she’s bringing her 9/11 worker-cleanup experience to bear on what will likely be a similar problem. It’s the definition of leadership, and something we hardly recognize in our representatives any more.
Good for Carolyn Maloney.
Since comments are off upthread, I’ll put it here:
No progressive should support what looks like the hereditary principle in politics.
Rory Reid should never have been bossed in, and now that he has, he deserves to lose.
watertiger is upstairs!
Late Night: GOP Joins in Campfire Rendition of “Those Were The Days”
It may not be just the clean up workers who need respirators.
http://www.kingworldnews.com/kingworldnews/Broadcast/Entries/2010/7/17_Matt_Simmons.html