
Protest at the US Chamber of Commerce | Photo via SEIU/William Melton on Flickr
The US Chamber of Commerce has apparently spent too much time watching Mad Men: in a blog post this morning, Chamber blogger Brad Peck called women’s fight for pay equity to be nothing more than a “fetish for money,” and said women complaining about their pay should focus instead on “choosing the right partner at home.” The Chamber’s Peck also approvingly quoted a post that asked, “Should government force gym-man to share his beautiful babes with couch-potato man?”
This is all in a post on the Chamber’s blog called: “Equality, Suffrage, and a Fetish for Money.” You can’t make it up.
The Chamber’s Peck first decided to put the terms “full equality” and “pay gap” in scare quotes, which should be enough for one to tell that the Chamber isn’t serious about rights at work for women. But Peck was just getting started. He goes on to inform women that their desires for “pay and promotions” isn’t a big deal, because there are many other “values” to consider for working women.
…I believe that the overall tone is one of those cultural changes we need to make — the idea that giving up “pay and promotions” is a “terribly steep price” to pay for time away from work. These are only two of the many things that people value and depending on the weight that you assign to each of your values giving up a little might gain you a lot. Equality is a matter of ensuring equal access to opportunity, not ensuring identical outcomes in some areas depending on which opportunities you choose to take.
Everyone knows that “pay and promotions” are just a small part of why you work. I mean, really, Peck is right: women just work between other “opportunities you choose to take.” Indeed: Peck even says that by fighting for equal pay, you’re actually rolling back the 19th Amendment. Yes, he said this on the 90th anniversary of the 19th Amendment passing.
A different battle indeed, one that also centers on choice. Suffragettes were fighting to give women equality of choice; those fighting for “full equality” are trying to actually legislate away choice.
What’s behind women’s apparently insane desire for equal pay? Why, according to Peck, it’s nothing more than a “Scrooge-like fetish for money.” The phrase was included in an op-ed cited by the Chamber, but not only did the Chamber’s Peck pull out the quote, reference it in the text, and then include it in the title, the Chamber defended it in a tweet. In an original tweet, the Chamber specifies:
Fixating on pay as the only thing of value shows a fetish for money.
Let’s forget about how mind-blowing it is the Chamber to tell women that it’s a “fetish” to fixate on pay. Let’s look for real solutions to the problem of women fighting for equal pay. Chamber of Commerce, take it away:
It is true that culturally speaking women are more likely to have to make the tough choices about work-life balance. But as we all seek to fit our values into a dynamic 24/7 economy, let’s not overlook the obvious, immediate, power-of-the-individual solution: choosing the right place to work and choosing the right partner at home.
Shorter Chamber to women: get back in the kitchen, honey.
UPDATE: In case you were wondering if this was a one-off incident, rest assured: the US Chamber of Commerce really hates women.
- 1977: US Chamber opposes amendment to Civil Rights Act that would ban discrimination against pregnant women.
- 1978: US Chamber says pregnancy is a “voluntary” condition in its opposition to Pregnancy Discrimination Act.
- 1987: Family Medical Leave Act “sets a dangerous precedent,” according to the US Chamber.
- 1998: US Chamber opposes Equal Pay Act because “work experience does tend to create greater wage gaps.”
- 2007: US Chamber opposes Lilly Ledbetter’s court case for equal pay because “tear-stained testimony” prejudices against a defendant. Opposed the bill in Congress to right the wrongs against Ledbetter in 2008 and 2009 as well.
- 2007: Chamber official pledges “all out war” against Family Medical Leave Act, and in 2010 made it a “priority” to fight in Congress.
- Monday: US Chamber again cites pregnancy as a “voluntary choice.”
Brad Peck isn’t just speaking out of his ass here. He’s continuing a decades-long tradition at the US Chamber of Commerce of hating women and opposing any effort to gain equal ground.



43 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
Everyone knows that Gooper women just do as they’re told – they aren’t allowed to think for themselves – the Chamber and Peck are doing them a service by thinking for them…
Un-fucking-believable. Yes, little ole me said the F-bomb. How unlady like!
Isn’t a “Scrooge-like fetish for money” the reason the Chamber exists, and the reason Peck works for them?
OUTRAGEOUS
I guess single women should all be living in a studio apartment with a roommate and without any health insurance.
Time for a flash mob at the chamber.
Shhhh…. Let this Peck(er) fellow come up with his own posts. I don’t think he’ll h/t; might give you too much of a sense of entitlement…
Ding, ding, ding. Give strangelyenough a cigar (or spliff):
CoC’s Missionary Position.
Isn’t “incentive” the same thing is money, really? (:>
Phyllis Schlafly approves this message.
WTF?!!
Much of the argument from the chamber centers around the word choice. I wonder how they feel about the freedom to choose not to carry a fetus to term?
This has to be from The Onion?. Please tell me it is.
And if Laura Blankfein can do it, anyone can.
I’m thinking that Brad Peck doesn’t get out much.
Gooper cultural values insist that a young woman must be stamped-out by their system as a ‘blank slate’ – devoid of any personal drive other than to ‘serve’ – so she can then spend the rest of her life trying to be the woman her Gooper man wants her to be.
I’m pretty jaded, but this one is especially execrable.
The US Chamber of Commerce is a bunch of right wing wacko’s
Who listens to a word they say anyway -
Funny thing how the ‘money fetish’doesn’t come up when it comes to screwing over men’s salaries in the interest of ‘shareholder value.’
Peck is a dick(head)
“Now, honey, remember, we’re voting straight-ticket Republican – or else you’ll cancel my vote.”
Boycott all of the members business? Works for me.
Women actually date and marry bozos like this?
You know all those men could give up some of their salaries so that women’s salaries could be more equitable. If men didn’t have a “money fetish,” that is.
What’s that? Oh it’s OK for men to have good salaries? It’s only a “money fetish” when women want equal salaries?
Fuck you, Chamber of Commerce.
When I was little, I was going to marry a millionaire, but in real life, that kinda guy just wasn’t my kinda guy. I guess it would be nice to be financially secure but I always ask myself, “at what cost?”
Perhaps our MOTU’s in Wall St would give up their pay to prevent a few foreclosures?
Or do they also have a Scrooge Like Fetish for money?
Ah, the rank stench of misogyny, which apparently has found a welcome home in the U.S. Chamber of Commerce for nigh this last generation.
Indeed: Fuck you, CoC.
Totally unsurprising to me, who has fought the good ERA fight, lo all those many years ago. Plus watched the likes of hypocritical, double-standard, do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do, money-grubbing, lying, money-fetishists like turn-coat Phyllis Schlafly work this particular “room.”
US CoC = amoral, greedy, selfish, self-entitled, snobby, WASP, bigoted, racist, for-men-only, robber-barons sucking at the titties of the really well-connected in order to feather their own nests and eff the rest of the “small” people. They got theirs, now here’s one giant middle finger shoved up the noses of everyone else. STFU. Get offa our entitled gated laaaawwns.
They should be ashamed of themselves, but they will just be handsomely reward for their mysogynistic sexism on steroids.
The class war includes renewing the backlash against feminism as is also exhibited by the inroads made on abortion rights led by Bart Stupack, a D, in the HCR.
I’ve said it before: I will fight until I can fight no more. But younger women really, really, really need to wake up!!! and get involved before all of their rights are taken away from them.
This puts me more and more in mind of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Illegitimis non carborundum.
Well, I for one am glad to see the Chamber finally opposing this fetish for money that is corporate pay. Now that the Chamber’s on board, I expect the Obama Administration will get some regulations and legislation moving right along to eliminate all the gigantic bonuses those bastards in the financial industry have been paying themselves. Talk about a fetish for money! Whoda thought the Chamber would be leading the charge? I bet even the Chamber didn’t think they’d be leading the charge. I bet they didn’t even think.
.
Fixed it for ya. I got 30 days probation at work for sending this phrase via e-mail because of the word “bastards”. Admin said it was “profanity”, while I reminded Admin that in the 21st Century it’s merely a colloquialism. (:>
I’m thinking he doesn’t have sex with women.
He must be tired of cooking and cleaning for himself.
I had an occasion the other day to have a conversation with a Wal-Mart muckity muck and asked some specifically pointed questions in relation to recent court rulings on workplace sexual discrimination. He said they were going far the other way, fast tracking women–especially minority women up the ladder. I told him that’s the price of running an “old boys network” for so long. He admitted that it was an old boys network, but to be fair, many women declined advancement because it meant relocation which would uproot their families and their husbands simply would not approve.
Maybe in today’s economy that’s not such an issue.
Does Mother thumb and her four daughters count?
“The Handmaids Tail” is the Chamber of Commerce wet dream.
Those guys are unbelievable!!
My fave in Monday’s post you linked to at the end: we in the US highly value “freedom of contract,” along with voluntary choice.
The favorite of the Randish types when explaining why unions are evil, or why you shouldn’t know what your fellow employees earn, or minimum wage is almost as evil as unions, etc., etc. Goes well with “right to work.”
Are we just speeding backwards in time? All this ancient stuff we thought had been killed off is jumping back up from the grave. Dee-pressing.
Hey, she’s one of the Kapos in their New Order, getting special privileges for shitting on her sisters. See also the “Aunts” in The Handmaid’s Tale, or all too many female “queen bees” in male-dominated fields.
Actually, think of it as the Battle of the Bulge: A last fevered rear-guard action by people who can read the signs and know that everything they stand for is doomed, but who intend to make the winners suffer as much as they can before losing.
Holy crap.
Are they cro-magnon? Find a man instead of equal pay??
Really, isn’t it time we form a progressive version of the Chamber of Commerce? (Assembly of Business?)
I bet there are a lot of small business owners who don’t have a clue what the national office is doing with their money.
I think I’ll start going around my town to businesses that display the “Chamber of Commerce” sign, act as if I’m going to buy something, and then at the last moment *notice* the “Chamber of Commerce” sign and say, “Oh, you’re a member of that radical Republican organization? Never mind.” And then walk out.
is brad peck really a member of the chamber of commerce? it seems like ‘the chamberpost’ blog is not at all affiliated with the governmental agency? maybe i’m wrong. could someone verify?
The US Chamber of Commere sounds like a bunch of Civil War re-enactors sitting around the set of “Gods and Generals,” speaking in hushed, reverent tones of life down on The Plantation while George “Macaca” Allen sings “Bonnie Blue Flag.” Yea, yea, those were the days (the Carol Burnett version that takes a satirical ax to the fantasy)!
13
I’m thinking that Brad Peck doesn’t get
outmuch.The US Chamber of Commerce, home to the chamberpost blog, is not and has never been a governmental agency, despite their best attempts to confuse people via their naming. Perhaps you are thinking of the United States Department of Commerce, a Cabinet agency headed by former Washington State Governor Gary Locke?
This is crap! I will agree that often times, pregnancy is a voluntary choice. However, just because you choose to have a child does not mean you should have to endure un-equal treatment. In fact, I feel like having the ability to grow an entire human being should entitle me to more pay! Haha, just kidding (kind of.)