
Coming soon to a town near you: NAFTA 2.0! via Tom Giebel on flickr
In the 14 hours since the White House dumped the news of a NAFTA-style Korea Free Trade agreement on a Friday night, labor unions are deafly silent in opposing this job-killing agreement.
UAW came out in support, but to our count, no other unions have said a word. Firedoglake reported last night that President Obama, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, and Members of Congress worked the phones yesterday to keep unions quiet. The Steelworkers are reportedly on the fence about supporting, and their goal for the AFL-CIO is neutrality, or silence. So far, it’s working.
Just so we’re on the same page, Obama is continuing Bush’s unfair NAFTA-style free trade agreement with Korea with effectively none of the changes he promised. Public Citizen sums it up:
The Korea FTA text contains the extreme investor rights that promote offshoring; the private enforcement of those rights that had led to serial attacks on domestic environmental, health, and other safeguards; a ban on Buy America; limits on financial service regulation (recall, this is a 2007 pre-crisis text with all of the crazy extreme deregulation language of past Bush FTAs) and more of the most damaging NAFTA-style provisions Obama promised to fix.
The UAW is joined in supporting the NAFTA-style Korea Free Trade agreement by such protectors of working people as: US Chamber of Commerce CEO Tom Donohue; President of the National Association of Manufacturers John Engler; Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit; JP Morgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon; Amway CEO and top Republican funder Dick DeVos; Big Bank lobby group Financial Services Roundtable President Steve Bartlett; and more.
That’s just who the White House trumpeted in their press push. And that’s who the UAW stands with, as does any union who not just supports, but fails to oppose the NAFTA-style Korea Free Trade Agreement.
In the absence of any opposition from anyone in labor on the new NAFTA, I thought I’d do a public service and show where labor and its allies used to stand on this NAFTA-style agreement, before they were pushed back into the veal pen.
I’m sure it’ll be easy for these organizations to just copy and paste their previous opposition, since that’s what this agreement does. I’m looking forwarding to hearing anything from any of these entities to oppose NAFTA 2.0.
Richard Trumka, AFL-CIO, 11/18/10.
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka on Nov. 16 declined to say whether his organization would be able to support a final deal on the U.S.-Korea free trade agreement that only deals with the issues of improved market access for U.S. auto and beef exports, even though the AFL-CIO has pushed for broader changes.
In a conference call with reporters, Trumka refused to speculate on what a final deal on changes to the FTA could look like and how the AFL-CIO would respond. “We will have to see whether the improvements made make it more acceptable, and then we’ll make a decision,” he said. In its current form, the FTA is far from acceptable, he added.
“[I]f it doesn’t meet the needs of the American people and the American economy, then we’ll oppose it,” he said, in reference to the FTA. He argued that faulty trade deals have for decades “hollowed out the core” of the U.S. economy.
110 House Democrats, 7/22/10.
More than 100 U.S. Democratic lawmakers asked on Thursday to meet with President Barack Obama to discuss their concerns about his plan to seek congressional approval of a trade deal with South Korea.
“At a time when our economy is struggling to recover from the worst downturn since the Great Depression, it is unthinkable to consider moving forward with another job-killing FTA,” the 110 members of the U.S. House of Representatives said in a letter to Obama.
The letter underscores the battle Obama faces within his own party unless he persuades South Korea to make substantial changes to the agreement it negotiated three years ago with the administration of former President George W. Bush.
Richard Trumka, President, AFL-CIO, 6/29/10.
We remain deeply concerned about and strongly opposed to the U.S.-South Korea trade agreement as negotiated by the Bush Administration. The agreement would exacerbate our already lopsided trade relationship with South Korea, putting at risk thousands of good U.S. jobs in the auto, steel, and other industrial sectors. [...]
This flawed agreement is the last thing working people need. With a fragile and incomplete economic recovery, and unemployment estimated to remain near 10 percent for the foreseeable future, we should not be putting in place new trade agreements that will speed up the offshoring of U.S. manufacturing jobs.
Senator Barack Obama, 4/26/08.
“The only trade agreements I believe in are ones that put workers first,” Sen. Obama told members of the United Auto Workers in November. “Because trade deals aren’t good for the American people if they aren’t good for working people. That’s why I opposed CAFTA. That’s why I oppose the South Korea Free Trade Agreement.”
UAW Statement, 5/1/07.
KMWU and UAW firmly call on the Korean National Assembly and the U.S. Congress to reject the KORUS FTA. With the conclusion of the FTA negotiations, many commentators have framed the discussion largely in terms of a worker “zero sum game,” by focusing on how much and how quickly each nation’s tariffs would be reduced. More importantly, the FTA will lead to an acceleration of capital mobility and financial speculation, thereby pitting American workers against Korean workers in unlimited restructuring and driving down wages, employment stability and working conditions.
John Sweeney, then-President of the AFL-CIO, 4/2/07.
Working people in the United States and South Korea join today in vigorously opposing the Korea-U.S. Free Trade Agreement (KORUS FTA), and we will send a powerful message to the U.S. Congress and the Korean Parliament that any trade agreement between our countries must protect the fundamental rights of workers and contribute to the creation of good jobs in both countries.
The agreement, which is the largest since the North America Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), will not benefit the working people of the United States or South Korea. The AFL-CIO along with our Korean union counterparts, the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) and the Federation of Korean Trade Unions (FKTU) strongly oppose any agreement that will hurt working families, farmers, and domestic producers in both countries. This flawed deal contains no enforceable protections for core workers’ rights, and it will undermine both governments’ ability to provide affordable and high-quality public and social services, and to protect food safety, the environment, and public health.
AFL-CIO and Change to Win joint statement, 2/17/07.
We believe that the current model agreement, which so far has provided enormous benefits for a disproportionate few, will not likely generate widely shared economic prosperity for the majority of persons in the U.S. and South Korea. Indeed, some of the provisions under negotiation could jeopardize important public interest gains or narrow the policy space of governments to respond to the needs or wants of their citizens.
Anna Burger, Chairwoman of Change to Win, 6/9/06.
“This administration seems to think that ‘free trade’ means they get to freely trade workers’ rights and protections for the benefit and profit of global corporations,” the chair of Change to Win, Anna Burger, said in a statement. “We need fair trade, not trade that leads to fewer jobs, lower pay, worsened working conditions, and environmental degradation.”
U.S. labor groups compared a possible FTA with Korea with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.



57 Comments









Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About Work in Progress
Great piece, Michael.
I hope we as unions get our act together and protest this unfair trade agreement – and stand in solidarity with our Korean brothers and sisters and their unions fighting against this agreement.
Thanks for keeping track, Michael. Too disgusting & distressing for words.
Suggestion: On one of the posts about this subject, use a photo with all sorts of humans with muzzles over their mouths.
It would be more meaningful to retrace the stands among the rank and file members as well as their union bosses re Bill Clinton’s NAFTA thingy.
Send those jobs overseas! It’s the bipartisany thing to do. The only real hope we have is that the Senate Republicans won’t ratify any Obama treaties out of reflex.
Is there no one in a position of authority who will stand up to principles?
They’re all standing up to principle. Their principle is that the rich should get richer.
Isn’t it a bitch when there is every possibility that the tea-party will do more to protect American jobs than the nations biggest unions and the Democratic Party?
The unions on “free” trade, Amazon/Paypal/Corporate media helping to kill off Wikileaks; with the exception of a few DFH bloggers is there any organization left in America that isn’t willing to do the US governments dirty work for them?
It’s so depressing…
No. :-(. They are all bought.
Obama, and others, is polishing their pro-business resumes for their post 2012 Jobs ($500,00o per year for 12 days work per year attending board meetings), in the most profitable part of the US economy, the FIRE sector.
Yes. I’ve decided to join the Tea Party. When it come to jobs we have much in common.
Yeah, and damn few of the DFH bloggers are left. I haven’t been to KOS in a while but last I heard even most of the Orangutans are bending over and offering themselves to Obama.
I’ve heard more “reports” lately that Big Orange has finally awoken from it’s deep dark slumber is beginning to realize exactly who & what Obama is. They may be more available going forward to make “common cause” with.
Nope. There’s too much money to made off the slave wages and working conditions overseas. Soon the oligarchy in the USA will have driven the American worker’s standard of living down to a point where we will all be better off immigrating to Bangladesh. At least they have universal health care there—-such that it is. Peace
Yes. Important to keep track. A compelling presentation Michael.
But we now can see clearly what Obama’s philosophy is and it will not change. These kinds of treaties and laws will continue as long as he is in power. We just have to hope we can ride out another two years and haunt him with them in the elections. No more “it would be worse with the GOPers in power.” No. It is the same
Yes, a really big bitch, indeed, especially as the Kochs and other zillionaires are doing their darndest to astro-turf the Tea Party… which means it’s not exactly all that trustworthy. Just saying… but agree that the Tea Party has stood up *somewhat* more for the rights of our citizenry lately than even most of the unions do… sad to say.
I assume this deal means American farmers get to sell more food to South Korea. Farmers don’t see that if they have a bad year the American tax payer gets stuck paying the bill for food that was going to feed China or South Korea.
I am all far protecting farmers for crop losses provided the crops were going to be sold in America. I am less than thrilled to pay for crop losses for crops that were going to be sold to China or South Korea. The Chinese and South Koreans can pay American farmers for crop losses that were going to be sold to them anyway if they want!
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2010/12/04/washing-hands-cheap-way-to-stop-plant-disease/
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/10/business/10agriculture.html
I assume from these numbers that 20% of farm subsidies tax payer funded farm subsides pay for food going to other countries.
Any numbers on how much more food will be sent over seas to South Korea with this trade deal? How much more it will cost American taxpayers to pay this for food that is being sent overseas?
Any words on South Korea currency manipulation because without a deal on that we won’t sell any cars to South Korea. Bush 1 tried this 20? years ago with Japan and we sell how many cars to Japan now? What makes Obama think his deal is better?
The Fed Audit also revealed loans to the state owned Korea Development Bank.
So we’re also using tax-payer money to HELP this bullshit move along.
I think the key to forming a coalition with the tea party is to somehow separate out the non-racists, the blue collar “Reagan Democrats”, the members that truly believe America is endangered by the moneyed interests on Wall Street/K Street and their Washington partners, and others that used to be represented by the unions and Democratic Party.
I have no clue as to how to do this….
These jobs Obama claims will be created are they really new jobs sure the EU has a trade deal with South Korea but we have thousands of troops, tanks, planes ships etc in South Korea explain why South Korea has any Tariffs on our goods?
If South Korea does not buy our stuff well I am ok with moving our troops out of South Korea just how much does having thousands of troops in South Korea cost?
Tell South Korea tariffs equal no troops GET A SPINE OBAMA!
I am pretty sure South Koreans would be willing to have US troops leave as a stand alone proposition. Those troops are there because the US government wants them there.
What concessions did Obama make to get this deal what was the original deal that South Korea refused to sign despite Obama visiting the country last month I’m curious just what Obama gave away to make this deal happen.
Any links to support this because thats is information we can use. Any South Korean news links would count double and help the front pagers.
The savings to America of South Korea withdrawing troops would be a great way to cut the national debt. Lets see the Tea Baggers argue against saving money by cutting bases.
So what’s the quid pro quo, I wonder?
So what else does anyone need to know?
http://www.ipsnewsasia.net/bridgesfromasia/node/38
Why are we wasting money if they don’t want us there.
From my perspective, I consider them all to be nothing more than two-bit gangsters until proven otherwise. In other words, that’s my baseline. Obviously, the same standard applies to their ruling class benefactors.
Fuckin’ criminals.
I generally presume that US decisions decide such questions, not vice versa. For example, recent elections in Japan have been won by candidates that ran on removing US bases, especially in Okinawa, and the US pushed back hard and little change has resulted. The late Chalmers Johnson is best overall source on this issue – he spent a lot of time talking about incidents like the one you mention. In short, we are wasting our money because our elites want us there.
My best guess, from a little bit of searching, is that South Koreans want US troops to leave, but not immediately, and that often gets reported as saying they do not want us to leave immediately (which is misleading). See for example here (50% say withdrawn gradually and 4% say immediately) and here (26% say withdraw as soon as possible, 71% disagree, but that lacks the gradual option).
I have been wondering that myself I can’t find any quid that like jobs that was not going to happen anyway the idea South Korea has tariffs on our goods despite our having troops there is the kind of outrage Tea Baggers should be screaming about.
But of course the tea baggers are corporate pawns:)
Labor is really powerless at the present time.
Big Labor has not change with the times, they still fight like it is 1950.
Depression always give Employers more power, thus the need for Labor to have a friend in the White House
As long as un-employment stays high, Employers can step on Labor, thus the reason Obama avoids doing projects that put Labor back to work.
FDR help Labor during the Great Depression by keeping Labor working, Obama is doing the opposite, he is killing Labor, by not providing labor any Jobs.
Obama is no friend of labor, never has been, never will be.
Anyone watching tv how is the MSM spinning this?
Or is there a News blackout?
Big Labor has benefited so much from deindustrialization that its stated and unstated positions on the Korean deal can be chalked up to be just rational responses to a labor-friendly policy.
/sarcasm
Excellent post!
We’ve got how many tens of thousands of troops over there in harm’s way, staring down the barrels of the N. Koreans, and we apparently have no leverage to cut a trade deal that benefits the American worker?
I am so disgusted, I think I better go run around the block a few times … release some steam.
The President gives Big Labor a reprieve. For one whole week, Big Labor will not be required to serve coffee and tea to the important people at important Business-Government conferences.
the enemies of Big Labor below:
the white house is no friend of labor
the MSM is the mouth piece of Big Corporations
congress is own by the elite
and yes these are the same evil people that hate the rest of us!
what a country!
It’s another Obamination.
Just what if anything does the elite get much less America someone mentioned the Carlyle group Bush 1′s hedgefund had an interest in South Korea. But how big and what kind of interest?
From the 4/26/08 link:
Hmm, that’s funny, I could’ve SWORN McCain LOST the election….
Meh, so much for “elections have consequences”..
Maybe Obama’s promising that “this time” he’ll get card check through.
Yeah, right.
I’d love to see reports from the field re how Kos and the other usually reliable Obama cheerleaders are playing this.
I’m not sure as I rarely venture from my “home” here, but from the grapevine it sounds like we may need to reconsider classifying Kos as a usually reliable Obama cheerleader.
IF that’s the case, I applaud it. That’s one step closer. Now, if only those apologists would also take the next logical step, as there is just as much evidence for that step as there is in not supporting Obama, and that step is to realize it’s NOT just Obama. It’s the entire DEMOCRATIC PARTY at the national level.
We’re still not going to mount an effective opposition until enough have realized this truth as well, because they are still able to play bullshit games to convince many that’s it’s not the Democratic Party as a whole.
Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and their number 2′s in each house are ON THE SAME PAGE AS BARRY.
Still far too many have deluded themselves into believing otherwise on that score.
The WH should be asked that question:)
We’ll see if we can find one!
hahaha yeah card check! LOLz.
Learned powerlessness. Labor could fight back, like they have against every other job-killing NAFTA-style free trade agreement. but they won’t.
I agree, but Labor has leaders like Obama who are trojan horses
Labor has been taken over by weak and useless leaders.
times change, labor never did.
in 2010, any time some one attacks labor, labor should have tools to educate their membership ASAP. they don’t
I gave a link yesterday http://www.hereinreality.com/carlyle.html there are better sources. They build war equipment, they were a startup in the 1990s. Now they are fabulously wealthy investors like the Saudi family.
Good nieghbor father of two, wife school teacher defends BO like a brother. When I go over the big screen is on with MSM (not Fox). I share what is going on behind the scenes. He is in electrical, environmental clean up. BO took his tax creds as they use energy to asparge the hydrocarbons they remove.He is under water in the mortgage, under huge debt to keep his company afloat with no work in site. Yet he reminds me of the great HRC bill passed and other hollow acomplishment. He is in denial on the ME wars. There are a lot of loyal dems like him. He is a progressive he thinks.
“I assume this deal means American farmers get to sell more food to South Korea.”
But we need to remember that in the last generation “American farmers” no long mainly means families who own farms they farm themselves. It mainly now means large corporations who run industrial farms that abuse animals, pollute the environment, and pay below living wages to their workers. Plus they get large Federal subsidies to grow crops that are then made via industrial processes into chemicals masquerading as foods, high fructose corn syrup and partially hydrogenated soybean oil, which are then used to make cheap, junk food that is destroying the health of our nation.
Can you say “Archer Midland Daniels?”
‘I think the key to forming a coalition with the tea party is to somehow separate out the non-racists, the blue collar “Reagan Democrats” ‘
There aren’t many blue collar “Reagan Democrats” in the Tea Parties. They have been portrayed that way in the Plutocrats’ Propaganda Machine AKA the Media, but actual scientific investigation into their population has shown they are primarily upper income, suburban types who are either about to retire with their finances secure or have already.
The few blue collar types, who get trotted out in the reports, are actually Religious Right types whose worldview is so fixed by their authoritarianism and submission to the Beckian pundits that they’d never ally with “socialists.”
I don’t think the vast majority of blue collar, working folk who pragmatically vote by the economy are actually in the Tea Parties.
“Or is there a News blackout?”
Not as much as on Cancun.
I assume we can drop Trumka from the list of possible Progressive Challengers, right?
Nope! IT’S ALL RIGGED! Not just the Senate but the whole damn system. The oligarchs/plutocrats/greedy thieving bastards, (take your pick), have been planning this since FDR pushed back. Now, their progeny, whether real or ideological, are seeing generations of planning come to fruition. Welcome to serfdom. :(
Trumka rolls over for the admin every time.
He is quite an excellent actor in the current political theater of Dems as good-intentioned naifs doing what little they can in the face of inexplicably powerful Republican forces.
Does everyone realize trade deals allow Wall Street to expand overseas? The Dims are a wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Steet, Wall Street doesn’t want to give up its’ cushy finance economy and have it replaced by a manufacturing economy (something that creates real wealth).
Good point. The banks have given up on America (sitting on the TARP, not lending to American business), and they’ve moved on to Asia.
it’s going to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Is this another N.A.F.T.A..You know it’s fine to get tomatoes, avocados, poinsettias’s in season from Mexico but not at the cost of jobs .In hindsight which is 20-20 my Teamster brothers had it right back in the 90s stop the trucking coming across the border.Will we get 70,000 jobs on Korea trade as Obama says ?.Lets build from within with jobson, Bridges,train service,electrical grids.Dams and cooling towers